内详

童子山（万思维 饰）是青年知识分子，下放到江南偏远的山乡接受再教育。生活的突变使得他心灰意冷，性格变得沉闷和颓废。他在一次繁重劳动中差点丢掉性命，幸得纯美善良的莲妹子相救。之后，童子山被分派到更偏僻的山村彭家湾小学做代课老师，而莲妹子（何晴 饰）恰好在这个学校做饭。    宁静美丽的山村使得童子山精神 得以放松，莲妹子和大队书记彭永贵以及众乡民的淳朴让他倍感温暖，让他重拾了生活的信心。然而面对莲妹子的爱意，他却不知所措，他害怕会连累莲妹子。加之，公社书记刘国发（刘惠 饰）的小舅子邮递员徐冬青（彭博 饰）正对莲妹子仰慕已久，而且双方的长辈都正在力促这门亲事。    于是童子山一开始选择了逃避莲妹子对自己的感情。叔叔刘永贵觉察到莲妹子对童子山心生情愫，对她提出了严厉的警告。    莲妹子却无法抑制内心对童子山的爱慕之情，几经纠结和挣扎，莲妹子终于在避雨的山洞鼓起勇气向童子山表达了自己对他的爱慕之心，童子山沉默不语，这深深伤害了她的自尊心，羞怒交加的莲妹子深感绝望，决定听从家人的安排，和邮递员徐冬青相亲。然而童子山的病倒，使这个善良纯情的女孩再一次深深的陷入了对童子山的爱恋之中。而童子山也因莲妹子义无返顾的为自己所做的一切而倍受感动，生生被关闭在内心深处的爱恋汹涌而出。两个年轻人悄然而幸福地恋爱了……

三峡建设工作正在进行中的奉节县城，迎来一男一女两个山西人。男人韩三明（韩三明饰）来自汾阳，是名忠厚老实的煤矿工人，来奉节为寻十六年未见的前妻。前妻是他当年用钱买来的，生完孩子后跑回了奉节。寻找前妻的过程中波折不断，韩三明决定留下来做苦力一直等到前妻出现。女人沈红（赵涛饰）来自太原，是名沉默寡言的护士，为寻多日不曾与自己联系的丈夫而来奉节。丈夫与她的夫妻关系早已是有名无实，这点她虽然深知，仍想让丈夫当面给她个说法。沈红的找寻过程也不是一帆风顺，丈夫在有意无意地躲着她。韩三明和沈红虽不认识，却因为要做相对意义上的“拿起”与“舍弃”抉择，在冥冥之中有了某种神秘的联系。本片荣获2006年第63届威尼斯国际电影节金狮奖。

很多人一定还记得这首歌“美琪和她妈妈到山上去，发生一件事情很稀奇，她们遇到一只黄色的小野猫，跟着他们不离去……”随着这部动画的热播，这首主题曲也广为流传。歌词的内容即可概括故事的剧情。小学一年级的木叶美琪和爸爸妈妈到山上去玩，在树林里，意外发现了一只橘色长尾巴的狸猫。小狸猫长得很可爱，又无家可归，于是美琪一家把狸猫带回了家，把她命名为“叮当猫”。叮当猫会施展各种法术，惹出了不少有趣的故事，带给大家很多欢乐。本片改编自藤子•F•不二雄的漫画。原著里的许多故事后来改变成了哆啦A梦的动画。为了和哆啦A梦有所区别，动画版的主人公从男孩变为了女孩美琪。

二柱家穷得叮铛响，但人却十分善良，养着并非亲生的病母亲艰难地过活。因几年前二柱曾救过巧哥儿的父亲，漂亮姑娘巧哥喜欢上了他。为了二柱与巧哥儿的相亲顺利，乡亲们从各家搬来东西把二柱家打扮地很好。巧哥对二柱说她要过上富裕的生活。二柱妈不想拖累他们，欲自杀，被二柱劝回，说自己愿意退亲。可巧哥儿帮助二柱种树、干活，让他家更快富起来。村里的大款孙兴光看上巧哥儿，买通其母不让巧哥儿嫁给二柱。但在二人的共同努力下，最终还是走到一起，而孙兴光，而赔了夫人又折兵。

Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.' By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses. Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together. One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature: he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around. While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next: the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with his/her partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken. Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...